<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kelly Davio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kellydavio.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kellydavio.com</link>
	<description>Writer, Editor, Teacher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everything You&#8217;ve Wanted to Know about Using Submishmash (From this Editor&#8217;s Perspective, That Is) by Kelly Davio</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/25/everything-youve-wanted-to-know-about-using-submishmash-from-this-editors-perspective-that-is/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Davio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=622#comment-939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah, I find that so interesting that there are publications who want you to resubmit the whole group of work. Thinking about it from the publisher&#039;s angle, I cannot see any upside to that arrangement. Usually by the time someone withdraws work from me, I&#039;ve made some progress through the submission already. Making someone jump to the back of the queue would mean I&#039;d have to start all over again (not to mention lose all the notes and comments I&#039;d made on a submission). It seems just as bad for the publisher as the writer. 

But perhaps this is why some journals have year-long wait times. (Personally, I think that if publishers can&#039;t clear the decks or at least have them mostly cleared in three months, they&#039;re most likely using some pretty clunky, redundant process.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, I find that so interesting that there are publications who want you to resubmit the whole group of work. Thinking about it from the publisher&#8217;s angle, I cannot see any upside to that arrangement. Usually by the time someone withdraws work from me, I&#8217;ve made some progress through the submission already. Making someone jump to the back of the queue would mean I&#8217;d have to start all over again (not to mention lose all the notes and comments I&#8217;d made on a submission). It seems just as bad for the publisher as the writer. </p>
<p>But perhaps this is why some journals have year-long wait times. (Personally, I think that if publishers can&#8217;t clear the decks or at least have them mostly cleared in three months, they&#8217;re most likely using some pretty clunky, redundant process.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everything You&#8217;ve Wanted to Know about Using Submishmash (From this Editor&#8217;s Perspective, That Is) by SarahJ</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/25/everything-youve-wanted-to-know-about-using-submishmash-from-this-editors-perspective-that-is/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SarahJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=622#comment-938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find withdrawing a poem from a bundle via Submishmash tricky, too. Some publications give clear instructions - usually 1) send an email withdrawing the poem, or 2) withdraw whole submission and re-submit.  Although I prefer the former, any advice is helpful. In the latter case, I spent a whole year withdrawing and re-submitting poems to the same publication because of a poem being accepted elsewhere. If the publication is dealing with submissions as they come in, that meant I went back to the bottom of the pile every time. I finally gave up. I understand some publications need time to read and come to a decision, but making the poet withdraw wholesale and return to the end of the line almost forces her to make exclusive rather than simultaneous submissions. Anyway, just my rant. Otherwise I like the tidiness of Submishmash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find withdrawing a poem from a bundle via Submishmash tricky, too. Some publications give clear instructions &#8211; usually 1) send an email withdrawing the poem, or 2) withdraw whole submission and re-submit.  Although I prefer the former, any advice is helpful. In the latter case, I spent a whole year withdrawing and re-submitting poems to the same publication because of a poem being accepted elsewhere. If the publication is dealing with submissions as they come in, that meant I went back to the bottom of the pile every time. I finally gave up. I understand some publications need time to read and come to a decision, but making the poet withdraw wholesale and return to the end of the line almost forces her to make exclusive rather than simultaneous submissions. Anyway, just my rant. Otherwise I like the tidiness of Submishmash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everything You&#8217;ve Wanted to Know about Using Submishmash (From this Editor&#8217;s Perspective, That Is) by Kelly Davio</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/25/everything-youve-wanted-to-know-about-using-submishmash-from-this-editors-perspective-that-is/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Davio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=622#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to be of help! And if there&#039;s something I&#039;ve not covered here that you&#039;d like to know about, ask away...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to be of help! And if there&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve not covered here that you&#8217;d like to know about, ask away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everything You&#8217;ve Wanted to Know about Using Submishmash (From this Editor&#8217;s Perspective, That Is) by Stephanie Barbe Hammer</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/25/everything-youve-wanted-to-know-about-using-submishmash-from-this-editors-perspective-that-is/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Barbe Hammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=622#comment-936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Kelly -- this is incredibly helpful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kelly &#8212; this is incredibly helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I&#8217;m Reading: The Marriage Plot (also known as Jonathan Franzen&#8217;s Plot, or I Don&#8217;t Want to Read This Plot Anymore) by Kelly Davio</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/16/what-im-reading-the-marriage-plot-also-known-as-jonathan-franzens-plot-or-i-dont-want-to-read-this-plot-anymore/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Davio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=620#comment-933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The backstory! Ugh, the backstory. It felt like having a conversation with that one friend who always gives far too much information and loses the thread of the conversation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The backstory! Ugh, the backstory. It felt like having a conversation with that one friend who always gives far too much information and loses the thread of the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I&#8217;m Reading: The Marriage Plot (also known as Jonathan Franzen&#8217;s Plot, or I Don&#8217;t Want to Read This Plot Anymore) by Joe Ponepinto</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/16/what-im-reading-the-marriage-plot-also-known-as-jonathan-franzens-plot-or-i-dont-want-to-read-this-plot-anymore/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Ponepinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=620#comment-932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started reading &quot;Plot&quot; a couple of weeks ago and had to stop. As good as I thought &quot;Middlesex&quot; was, that&#039;s how bad &quot;Marriage Plot&quot; is. So, so much backstory. Like reading the author&#039;s notes. Is this what comes with success--an overconfidence that allows an author to believe he hardly has to try, that every scribble is a gem? Or was &quot;Middlesex&quot; the fluke?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started reading &#8220;Plot&#8221; a couple of weeks ago and had to stop. As good as I thought &#8220;Middlesex&#8221; was, that&#8217;s how bad &#8220;Marriage Plot&#8221; is. So, so much backstory. Like reading the author&#8217;s notes. Is this what comes with success&#8211;an overconfidence that allows an author to believe he hardly has to try, that every scribble is a gem? Or was &#8220;Middlesex&#8221; the fluke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I&#8217;m Reading: Mary Johnson&#8217;s An Unquenchable Thirst by Kelly Davio</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/09/what-im-reading-mary-johnsons-an-unquenchable-thirst/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Davio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=616#comment-927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe, I do hope you&#039;ll read it--it&#039;s really a remarkable story. It had me up until 2:00 am one morning because I couldn&#039;t put it down! Who would&#039;ve thought?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I do hope you&#8217;ll read it&#8211;it&#8217;s really a remarkable story. It had me up until 2:00 am one morning because I couldn&#8217;t put it down! Who would&#8217;ve thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What I&#8217;m Reading: Mary Johnson&#8217;s An Unquenchable Thirst by Joe Ponepinto</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/09/what-im-reading-mary-johnsons-an-unquenchable-thirst/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Ponepinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=616#comment-926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oxford? That&#039;s it. I can&#039;t talk to you anymore.

As for the book, I have a copy and have been avoiding reading it. Now you make me want to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oxford? That&#8217;s it. I can&#8217;t talk to you anymore.</p>
<p>As for the book, I have a copy and have been avoiding reading it. Now you make me want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Talk About Books by Joe Ponepinto</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2012/01/02/lets-talk-about-books/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Ponepinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=613#comment-923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the direction you&#039;re taking the blog, Kelly. Looking forward to hearing about the books and authors you like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the direction you&#8217;re taking the blog, Kelly. Looking forward to hearing about the books and authors you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everybody&#8217;s Doing It (Making &#8220;Top&#8221; Lists for 2011, that is) by Kelly Davio</title>
		<link>http://kellydavio.com/2011/12/15/everybodys-doing-it-making-top-lists-for-2011-that-is/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Davio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellydavio.com/?p=603#comment-918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been hearing great things about the Doug Rice book--I think I need to pick it up! 

The Daily News list of overrated books is definitely interesting. I agree with the inclusion of the John Hodgeman book. JH could have called it a day after The Areas of My Expertise, which was funny in roughly the same way a child putting fries up his nose is funny (which is to say, funny for about 30 seconds).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been hearing great things about the Doug Rice book&#8211;I think I need to pick it up! </p>
<p>The Daily News list of overrated books is definitely interesting. I agree with the inclusion of the John Hodgeman book. JH could have called it a day after The Areas of My Expertise, which was funny in roughly the same way a child putting fries up his nose is funny (which is to say, funny for about 30 seconds).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

